<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>JUnit - 标签 | 飞污熊小站</title><link>https://xiongneng.me/tags/junit/</link><description>飞污熊小站</description><generator>Hugo 0.166.0 &amp; FixIt v0.4.6-20260512073637-464c4659</generator><language>zh-CN</language><managingEditor>yidao620@163.com (XiongNeng)</managingEditor><webMaster>yidao620@163.com (XiongNeng)</webMaster><copyright>XiongNeng</copyright><lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 02:16:47 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://xiongneng.me/tags/junit/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>SpringBoot4系列21 - 测试体系JUnit 6与Testcontainers</title><link>https://xiongneng.me/posts/java/springboot/sb4-testing/</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2026 00:30:00 +0800</pubDate><author>yidao620@163.com (XiongNeng)</author><guid>https://xiongneng.me/posts/java/springboot/sb4-testing/</guid><category domain="https://xiongneng.me/categories/java/">Java</category><description>&lt;p&gt;先说一个我印象很深的场景：一家公司的订单服务上线两年，测试全靠打开浏览器手工点接口。下单、支付、查列表、删订单，一轮点下来四十分钟，改了支付逻辑还得把查询和删除再点一遍。一次完整回归半天起步，改一行代码不敢当天上线，攒到周五集中发布，发布窗口里谁也说不准哪条旧逻辑会被带崩。&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>